Menu

Fan Casting Peter Robbins as Charlie Brown in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20

makenzietroglin made this fan casting suggestion on October 19, 2023. What do you think? See below to cast your vote, or click here to see all fan casting suggestions for this role.

Peter Robbins as Charlie Brown in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20

Peter RobbinsUnited States

Peter Robbins (born Louis Nanasi; August 10, 1956 – January 2022) was an American child actor. Robbins gained national fame in the 1960s as being the first actor to voice Charlie Brown in the Peanu...
See Profile
Loading another FastCast...
Charlie Brown in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20 add character image
Fan Casting

Peter Robbins

as

Charlie Brown

in

Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20

Do you agree?

Vote Yes Vote No
Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20

Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20

Christmas Special
Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer is a 1964 Christmas stop motion animated television special produced by Videocraft International, Ltd. (later known as Rankin/Bass Productions)[1] and currently distr...
See Story

Has this person been officially cast for this role? Click here.

Fan casting suggestion made by:

makenzietroglin

Join the Conversation

0 comments on Peter Robbins as Charlie Brown in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20

Post

Peter Robbins has been suggested by fans for 32 roles on myCast, including Suggestions in Celebrities You Wish Were Still Alive. Similar actors include Kevin Conroy, Robin Williams, and Ray Liotta. Peter Robbins was suggested to play Charlie Brown in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20 by makenzietroglin. Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) (Extended Version) 20 has 20 roles, including Hamilton hocks, Holly DeCarlo, and Xavier Riddle.

Supporters (1)
Opposers (0)
  • Nobody opposes this suggestion yet.